The devil is in the details, or not.

Furniture, furnishings and other items of antique interest
Post Reply
User avatar
BungalowMo
Been here a good while
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:51 pm
Location: Front Royal, Virginia

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by BungalowMo »

Your repost is right side up! To me anyway.
~ Maureen
1916-ish Craftsman Bungalow

User avatar
Gothichome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4184
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:34 pm
Location: Chatham Ont

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Gothichome »

Well I finally got that new build into our piano lamp. It's a tungsten filliment bulk 25 watt. A little better.
Image


User avatar
Mick_VT
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2437
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Central Vermont
Contact:

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Mick_VT »

Very nice! I have been finding that the modern carbon filament "vintage" bulbs give a light that very closely resembles the color temperature of kerosene. if you get the smaller ones they fit well inside a lamp chimney.
Mick...

User avatar
Eperot
Stalwart
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 3:48 am
Location: Northern New Jersey

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Eperot »

Yup. I don't care what anyone says or how many ways they try to warm up the color of LED's...nothing comes close to incandescent.
Jacob Beaty House, 1874.

User avatar
Gothichome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4184
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:34 pm
Location: Chatham Ont

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Gothichome »

Well folks blew the 2016 antique budget even before 2015 ended. Bought this bedroom suite for the master. It would have been a very expensive suite when new and the high end quality would justify the cost, both then and now.
Image
The set was built in 1868. The bed was originally built as a Victorian king size wich means a modern queen drops rite in. A rare size to find, it has not been modified for queen size and it solid walnut. We have three pieces, a set of drawers and a wash stand as well, all match.
Image
The mirror stands almost nine feet high, the carcass is oak the rest is walnut the top white marble.
Image
The washstand/camode has lost it's marble back board, other than that this set is complete except for a tall boy dresser.
We have been looking for a matching bedroom suite for years, this showed up on the local Kajjiji (Canadian version of Craig's list). It was the rite antique, in the rite style, in the rite condition, and at the rite price. Bought the day the listing came out.

User avatar
Eperot
Stalwart
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 3:48 am
Location: Northern New Jersey

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Eperot »

Wow, what luck and such a beautiful set! That headboard is as tall as your doors! Enjoy it.
Jacob Beaty House, 1874.

User avatar
Mick_VT
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2437
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Central Vermont
Contact:

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Mick_VT »

Great find Gothichome! I cant think of a house more suited to that furniture, it is like it was made for it!
Mick...

User avatar
Al F. Furnituremaker
Stalwart
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 3:31 pm
Location: Binghamton, NY
Contact:

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Al F. Furnituremaker »

Really nice. Great find!

User avatar
Gothichome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4184
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:34 pm
Location: Chatham Ont

Re: The devil is in the details, or not.

Post by Gothichome »

Thanks, it was a matter of biting the bullet now or hope we find another set as nice in the future at the same cost. As mentioned it has been years that we have been looking.
Al, took this pic with all you fine carpenters in mind.
Image
This is one of the draw slides/glides each draw has a pair. They make the draws slide effortlessly with no side jamming. There is a brass spring loaded pivot. Have any of you seen a set up like this in the past?
Image
This is the stamping, patented 1859, also just noticed a date of 1860. Hummm, wonder if this set was built then rather than 1868.

Post Reply